"Supreme Court Order in Relation to Treatment of Imran KhanImran Khan is entitled to all medically necessary treatment. The state remains responsible for protecting his health and providing appropriate specialist care.Article 25 guarantees equality before law. Any medical facility available to one prisoner must be available to every similarly placed prisoner under the same objective criteria.The issue requiring examination is the discovery of a personality-specific arrangement: selection of a privately nominated hospital, prescription of the period of admission and an open-ended direction concerning custody.Courts protect the right to medical treatment. Hospital selection, security arrangements, custody protocols and the duration of admission must remain linked to medical advice, prison rules and administrative feasibility.Doctors must determine whether hospitalisation is necessary and how long it should continue. Political preference cannot replace an independent medical assessment.An order to keep a convicted prisoner in a private hospital until further directions creates an indefinite custodial arrangement without an identified medical threshold for discharge.Shifa International Hospital cannot become a privileged extension of prison for one political personality while ordinary prisoners remain governed by a different framework.The age of person-specific judicial activism must remain closed. The authority of the courts rests upon consistent principles applicable equally to every citizen.The simplest test is clear: would an ordinary prisoner with the same medical condition receive the same hospital, the same duration of admission and the same judicial protection? If not, the arrangement raises a serious question of exceptional treatment.Respect for the judiciary requires lawful compliance. It also permits the government to seek review or clarification where an order appears to enter the operational domain of the executive.The government will examine the certified order on legal, medical, administrative and security grounds and pursue the appropriate review or appeal.Every judicial order must also be capable of safe and practical implementation. Hospital security, uninterrupted healthcare services and lawful custody cannot be treated as secondary considerations.The governments position should remain firm: complete medical care, uniform application of law and no special custodial regime for any individual."