Conflict-related sexual violence is not merely a tragic byproduct of war—it is a calculated weapon used to terrorize, dehumanize, and subjugate communities, especially under foreign occupation. Despite landmark United Nations resolutions—1325 (2000) and 1820 (2008)—the international community has repeatedly fallen short of its promises. The gap between rhetoric and reality remains vast. My opinion: While these resolutions were historic in naming sexual violence as a threat to international peace and security, they have too often been treated as symbolic gestures rather than binding mandates. Perpetrators face impunity; survivors lack access to justice, reparations, and psychological support. The question we must confront is not whether we have the tools, but whether we have the collective will to enforce them. Until protection, prosecution, and dignity become non-negotiable pillars of every peace process, we are complicit in the very violence we claim to oppose.

In the wake of the devastating terrorist incidents in Ziarat and Lasbela, Pakistani security forces have launched a sweeping and highly aggressive crackdown against the banned terrorist outfits Fitna Al Hindustan (FAH) and Fitna Al Khawarij (FAK). According to official statements, a total of 38 FAH/FAK terrorists have been 'sent to hell' in these ongoing operations, which are being conducted with precision and urgency across multiple districts. The security apparatus has signaled that this is only the beginning—a major retribution operation is now being planned across the entirety of Balochistan, with a specific focus on targeting the handlers and masterminds operating from sanctuaries inside Afghanistan. This marks a significant escalation in counterterrorism efforts, reflecting a zero-tolerance policy toward militant networks that threaten Pakistan's stability. From my perspective, the scale and intensity of this response underscore a critical shift: the state is no longer merely reacting to attacks but proactively dismantling the infrastructure of terror. While the elimination of 38 terrorists is a tangible success, the true test lies in sustained pressure on cross-border sanctuaries. The mention of operations against handlers inside Afghanistan signals a potential for diplomatic strain, but it also demonstrates Pakistan's resolve to defend its sovereignty. The use of the term 'sent to hell' conveys a stark, uncompromising message to anyone who would challenge the state's authority. This operation, if executed thoroughly, could serve as a major deterrent and bring a measure of peace to a region long plagued by violence.

In a significant development, the Government of Balochistan has announced the safe recovery of all individuals who were abducted from Killi Babri Hanna Orak. The operation, carried out with the unwavering support of local communities and the dedication of security forces, underscores the state's resolve to protect every citizen's life and property. This successful recovery not only brings relief to the affected families but also deals a blow to hostile elements attempting to destabilize the region. From my perspective, this is a testament to the effectiveness of coordinated security efforts and the resilience of the Baloch people. However, it also highlights the persistent security challenges in the province. The government's strong statement that every hostile attempt will be defeated sends a crucial message of deterrence. Achieving lasting peace in Balochistan requires not only military operations but also sustained socio-economic development and dialogue. This recovery is a step forward, but a united, peaceful Balochistan will demand continued vigilance and inclusive governance.