In a pointed social media commentary, a user expressed hope that Iran, after confronting the realities of the recent war against Israel, will finally abandon its longstanding 'Indian Sympathy Syndrome'—a term used to describe Tehran's perceived over-reliance on or favoritism toward New Delhi at the expense of Islamabad. The user argues that India has historically maintained close ties with Iran on energy and trade, yet failed to stand by Iran in moments of crisis, especially during military confrontations with Israel. By contrast, Pakistan shares a border, a common religious identity, and a strategic interest in countering Israeli influence in the region. The implication is that the latest conflict has exposed India's limited willingness to back Iran in a direct confrontation, whereas Pakistan has consistently offered diplomatic and moral support. My opinion: This viewpoint reflects a realist geopolitical assessment. Iran has indeed balanced its relationships with both India and Pakistan, but recent events could pivot Tehran toward deeper cooperation with Islamabad—especially in energy, defense, and trade. If Iran shifts its paradigm, it could unlock extensive bilateral deals that benefit both nations economically and strategically, while reducing reliance on a distant India that cannot offer the same immediate security guarantees. However, the phrase 'Indian Sympathy Syndrome' oversimplifies a complex foreign policy calculus; Iran must also consider its ties with Russia and China, which may influence any pivot. Nonetheless, the post-war environment presents a unique window for Pakistan to position itself as Iran's indispensable friend in need.