BREAKING: Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid criticises Lebanon agreement, saying it 'allows for the continuation of money transfers from Iran to Hezbollah' and 'does not set a timetable for Hezbollah's disarmament' LIVE updates: https://t.co/HTEmhneJMg https://t.co/dG7tVIPipd News Analysis & Summary Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid has sharply criticized the newly signed Lebanon agreement, arguing it fails to address two critical security concerns. According to Lapid, the deal effectively allows the continued flow of money from Iran to Hezbollah, the militant group that operates across Lebanon's borders, without any mechanism to halt it. Furthermore, the agreement lacks a concrete timetable for Hezbollah's disarmament, leaving a key threat to Israeli security unresolved. Lapid's condemnation highlights a deep partisan divide in Israel over the terms of the arrangement, which was reportedly brokered with US mediation. In my opinion, this criticism is well-founded: any agreement that ignores the financial lifeline between Tehran and Hezbollah, and that does not mandate a clear schedule for dismantling one of the region's most heavily armed non-state actors, risks being little more than a temporary ceasefire rather than a sustainable peace. The deal may reduce immediate tensions, but without binding commitments to cut off Iranian funding and disarm Hezbollah, it leaves Israel's northern border vulnerable to future escalation. This also underscores the challenge of negotiating with non-state actors and their state sponsors, where enforcement mechanisms are often weak or non-existent. Source: @AJENews on X/TwitterPublic Engagement Views: 16,224 Likes: 23 Comments: 4 Shares: 7 Published: June 27, 2026, 9:30 pm