A controversy has erupted over the coverage of Pakistan’s diplomatic role in the Iran-United States conflict by India’s News18 channel, which boasts 4 million followers. The channel, which markets itself as a source of intellectual and in-depth reporting on global affairs, has claimed that Pakistan is acting as a forced mediator rather than a willing participant. However, emerging reports indicate that the Iran-US Memorandum of Understanding is officially titled the 'Islamabad Memorandum,' a direct nod to Pakistan’s capital. Furthermore, the document reportedly bears the signature of Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, not just as a witness but as a formal mediator. Despite these clear indicators of Pakistan’s proactive diplomatic role, sections of the Indian media are allegedly engaging in dismissive and mocking propaganda, refusing to acknowledge the country’s contributions. From my perspective, this reflects a troubling trend of prioritizing nationalistic narratives over factual reporting. Journalism should be a beacon of truth, not a tool for political point-scoring. When credible evidence—such as a document’s title and official signatures—is ignored or demeaned, it undermines the very purpose of objective media. Such rhetoric risks discouraging other nations from pursuing constructive diplomatic initiatives, as the fear of misrepresentation and ridicule can stifle peace efforts. Instead of fostering dialogue and unity, this approach deepens regional tensions and sets a dangerous precedent for how media can influence geopolitics. It is crucial for outlets like News18 to uphold journalistic integrity and report the facts, even when they are inconvenient to national pride.