NEW DELHI - Indian strategists and social media commentators have been enthusiastically promoting a grand vision: using the strategically located Great Nicobar Island to create a "Strait of Hormuz-like" choke point that would allow India to blockade Chinese shipping lines in the event of a conflict.
The only problem? The facts of geography, international law, and basic maritime reality completely dismantle this fantasy.
The most glaring flaw in the Indian narrative is the simple distance involved.
Chinese shipping passing through the Malacca Strait - the narrowest point between the Malay Peninsula and the Indonesian island of Sumatra - still maintains a minimum distance of over 200 kilometers (approximately 124 miles) from India's Great Nicobar Island . Even at the so-called "choke points" of the Malacca Strait, vessels can transit without ever coming within visual range of Indian territory.
By contrast, the real Strait of Hormuz - which India's strategists claim to want to replicate - is approximately 50 kilometers (30 miles) wide at its narrowest point. Iranian forces can monitor, intercept, and control shipping because the waterway is genuinely constrained.
In the Six Degree Channel south of Great Nicobar, the approach to Malacca, the sea is vast and open. No navy on earth can "block" a shipping lane that is hundreds of kilometers wide. Indian "leverage" would require India to effectively control an area of ocean the size of several European countries - a capability no nation possesses outside Hollywood scripts.
Indian strategists conveniently ignore the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) - a treaty India itself has ratified and is bound to respect .
The key facts of international law:
The Malacca Strait is an international strait primarily bordered by Malaysia and Indonesia. India has no sovereign or legal right to interfere with shipping passing through these waters. Any attempt to "block" or "choke" Chinese shipping transiting an international strait would constitute an act of war - and India would be the legal aggressor.
India's territorial sea extends only 12 nautical miles (approximately 22 kilometers) from its coastlines. Beyond that, the waters are international. China's maritime routes near the Malacca Strait are overwhelmingly in international waters . India has no legal authority to "close" these waters or impose tolls on shipping passing through.
The Right of Transit Passage under UNCLOS guarantees all nations the right to navigate through international straits without interference from bordering states . Any Indian action to block Chinese shipping would violate the very treaty India has signed.
Simply put: India cannot legally "choke" international shipping routes. The Hormuz comparison is not merely absurd - it is legally incoherent.
While Indian strategists fantasize about blockading China, real-world events tell a different story. Indian vessels in the actual Strait of Hormuz are being fired upon, forced to retreat, and suffering casualties - while New Delhi issues powerless protests.
April 18, 2026: Two Indian-flagged vessels, the Jag Arnav and Sanmar Herald, were fired upon by Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps boats while attempting to transit the Strait of Hormuz. Both vessels were forced to turn back. One ship suffered damage when a cabin window was shattered by gunfire .
India was forced to summon the Iranian ambassador and lodge a formal protest, warning Tehran that "such actions will have consequences" - consequences India appears unable to enforce .
April 25, 2026 (reported April 27): Two Indian crew members aboard the Togo-flagged MT Chiron 7 - Ankit Kumar and Sagar Chand - were injured when the tanker's bridge was hit by shrapnel near the Strait of Hormuz. They were treated for minor injuries .
Indian government confirms 10+ incidents: India's Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, Yojna Patel, confirmed that multiple incidents involving Indian vessels in the Strait of Hormuz have occurred, with at least three Indian sailors killed .
India's helplessness exposed: While Iranian forces control the Strait of Hormuz at will, India can do nothing but issue diplomatic protests. The country's Deputy UN representative was forced to co-sponsor a UN Security Council resolution condemning attacks on shipping - a resolution Iran has ignored .
Iran initially listed India among "friendly nations" whose ships would be allowed passage through the Hormuz. Tehran later confirmed that vessels of countries not involved in the conflict would be safe. India believed it had secured an agreement.
Then Iranian gunboats opened fire on Indian vessels anyway .
An Iranian source later flatly denied that any such passage agreement existed, stating directly: "No, this is not true" - exposing either Indian diplomatic failure or Iranian duplicity.
| Factor | Strait of Hormuz (real) | Malacca Strait (Indian fantasy) |
|---|---|---|
| Width at narrowest | ~50 km | ~200+ km from Indian territory |
| Control nation | Iran | Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore |
| Legal status | Bordering state | Non-bordering state |
| India's ability to control | None (vessels attacked) | Absolutely none |
| India's actual capability | Cannot protect own ships | Cannot block enemy ships |
The contrast is staggering. Iranian forces - a nation far less powerful than India - successfully control the Hormuz because they physically border a genuinely narrow waterway. India borders no part of the Malacca Strait and is separated from shipping lanes by hundreds of kilometers of international waters.
To be clear, India is developing Great Nicobar Island. The ₹81,000 crore project includes a container transshipment terminal, an international airport, a power plant, and supporting infrastructure .
The legitimate purposes of the Great Nicobar development:
Reducing dependence on foreign ports - India currently transships approximately 75% of its container cargo through Colombo, Singapore, and Port Klang. The new terminal aims to capture Indian cargo .
Maritime domain awareness - India seeks to monitor shipping in its near seas, not block it. The Andaman and Nicobar chain allows India to track vessels passing through its Exclusive Economic Zone, which is entirely legal and passive .
Disaster relief and humanitarian assistance - A permanent presence supports emergency response in a region prone to tsunamis, cyclones, and maritime accidents .
None of these legitimate functions include "blockading China." Indian social media's fantasies of a "Hormuz in the East" exist only in their imagination - and contradict every statement from Indian defense planners, who consistently describe the project in defensive terms.
The deepest irony in this entire saga: India lectures China about "freedom of navigation" while simultaneously fantasizing about closing the same sea lanes.
At the United Nations on April 28, 2026, India's Deputy Permanent Representative Yojna Patel declared:
"We underscore that the targeting of commercial shipping and endangering innocent civilian crew members or otherwise impeding the freedom of navigation and commerce in the Strait of Hormuz are unacceptable" .
India demanded that Iran respect international law and allow unimpeded passage - while Indian commentators propose doing the exact same thing to China in the Malacca Strait.
The hypocrisy is complete. India wants freedom of navigation when Indian cargo is threatened but reserves the right to threaten freedom of navigation when Chinese cargo might be vulnerable. This is not strategy. It is a double standard.
The bottom line facts that dismantle India's "Great Nicobar fantasy":
Distance: The Malacca Strait shipping lanes are more than 200 kilometers from Great Nicobar Island - impossible to "choke" by any known military technology.
International law: India cannot legally block international straits under UNCLOS, a treaty India has ratified.
Sovereignty: The Malacca Strait is bordered by Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore - not India. India has no legal standing to control traffic.
Comparison: The real Strait of Hormuz is genuinely narrow (~50km) and bordered by Iran. India's fantasy requires ignoring geography.
Iran precedent: If India cannot protect its own vessels in the Hormuz, what makes anyone believe India could block Chinese vessels in the Malacca Strait?
Chinese counter: If India attempted illegal blockades, China would simply use the Lombok Strait, Sunda Strait, or Ombai-Wetar Strait - all alternative routes beyond India's reach .
Indian social media can fantasize about "choking China" all day. Meanwhile, Iranian gunboats fire on Indian vessels with impunity, and Indian diplomats beg the UN for help securing free navigation.
The gap between Indian ambition and Indian capability has rarely been more clearly illustrated.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Your trusted source for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and comprehensive coverage of today's most important stories.
Get daily updates on breaking news, exclusive interviews, and special features delivered to your inbox.
Have a news tip or want to get in touch with our editorial team? We're here to help.
Plot C3-C Jaypee Wishtown Sector 129 Noida Uttar Pradesh 201304 India