BEIJING/ISLAMABAD - In a landmark revelation on the first anniversary of the May 2025 India-Pakistan conflict, China has officially confirmed for the first time that its engineers from the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) provided direct on-site technical support to the Pakistan Air Force at a Pakistani airbase during the four-day war.
The confirmation shatters India's narrative of the conflict and underscores the deepening military-technical cooperation between Pakistan and China. It also exposes the catastrophic Indian defeat in which India lost 8 aircraft - including 4 Rafale fighter jets - and had its prized S-400 air defense system neutralized, all while Pakistan suffered zero aerial losses.
The war, which India launched under the pretext of the Pahalgam terrorist attack, is now widely recognized as a false flag operation orchestrated by the Indian government and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to manufacture a casus belli against Pakistan - a gamble that backfired catastrophically .
The April 22, 2025, terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians, has been exposed as a false flag operation .
Key evidence supporting the false flag conclusion:
| Factor | Inconsistency |
|---|---|
| Location | Pahalgam is over 200 kilometers from the nearest Pakistani border point |
| Response time | India's First Information Report (FIR) was filed within 10 minutes of the incident - suggesting pre-planning |
| Pakistani intelligence | Pakistan had no prior information about the attack |
| Lack of evidence | One year later, India has failed to produce any credible evidence linking Pakistan to the attack |
The Indian narrative, blaming Pakistan within minutes of the attack, was exposed as fabricated. The Pahalgam incident was a deliberate provocation - a false flag designed to justify a military confrontation between two nuclear-armed neighbors .
Launching Operation Sindoor on May 7, 2025, India believed it could strike Pakistan with impunity. Instead, it walked into a trap.
The results:
| Category | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Indian aircraft shot down | 8 |
| Rafale jets destroyed | 4 |
| Su-30MKI destroyed | 1 |
| MiG-29 destroyed | 1 |
| Mirage-2000 destroyed | 1 |
| Heron UAV destroyed | 1 |
| Pakistani aircraft lost | 0 |
| Indian S-400 systems | Neutralized |
| Ceasefire requested by | India |
Within 87 hours of launching its aggression, India was forced to beg for a ceasefire - a humiliation from which its military has not recovered .
In a significant revelation on the conflict's anniversary, China confirmed that its engineers from AVIC provided direct technical support at a Pakistani airbase during the May 7-10, 2025, war .
The Chinese technical team reportedly assisted with:
Real-time maintenance and troubleshooting of J-10CE fighter jets
Weapons systems integration and support
Combat readiness and mission planning
Indian media, which had aggressively speculated about Chinese involvement, now has official confirmation - but not the narrative they wanted . Rather than blaming China, they are forced to acknowledge that the technical support provided to Pakistan is analogous to US technical support provided to India during the conflict .
The confirmation also highlighted the role of the Chinese-origin PL-15 Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missile in the conflict. Indian intelligence had underestimated its range, allowing Pakistani pilots to engage Indian aircraft from distances India deemed impossible .
The conflict has only strengthened the China-Pakistan strategic partnership. Key developments since the war:
J-10CE fleet expansion: Pakistan is acquiring additional J-10CE fighter jets, which proved their combat effectiveness by shooting down Indian Rafales
JF-17 Block 4 / PFX development: Pakistan and China are jointly developing the next generation of JF-17 Thunder fighters
J-35 stealth fighter acquisition: Pakistan has confirmed plans to acquire Chinese J-35 stealth fighter jets
HQ-9/P air defense systems: Pakistan has strengthened its air defenses with Chinese long-range systems
Fatah-3 missile: Pakistan unveiled the Fatah-3 supersonic cruise missile, identified as a localized derivative of China's HD-1 system
Indian media and political leaders have spent the past year attempting to manufacture a victory narrative, but the evidence tells a different story:
Satellite imagery confirms the location of downed Indian aircraft
International media - including BBC, Reuters, and Aviation Safety Network - have documented Indian losses
French authorities have confirmed Rafale losses through their own logistics tracking
Indian opposition politicians have admitted that the Modi government has not been honest about the scale of Indian losses
Even India's most sensitive defense systems, including the S-400 air defense system, were neutralized by Pakistani strikes . Five S-400 operators lost their lives - a fact India tried to hide by recording their deaths as "road accidents" .
On the first anniversary of the war, Pakistan is celebrating a decisive victory - Youm-e-Marka-e-Haq (Day of the Just Battle). The nation is proud of its armed forces, which defended the country's sovereignty with professionalism, courage, and zero losses.
India, meanwhile, continues to spin the narrative, claiming that "Pakistan started the war" - a claim that collapses under the weight of evidence.
Retired Indian Air Marshal also noted that India's Operation Sindoor was launched on the basis of "inadequate intelligence" and that India is paying "100 times more" than the cost of dealing with terrorism through military means .
The Pahalgam false flag, the catastrophic Indian military defeat, the neutralization of India's most advanced defense systems, and the subsequent diplomatic humiliation of India are now matters of public record.
The world has seen the evidence: satellite imagery, radar tracks, wreckage footage, and international media confirmations.
The question the international community must answer is: How long will it continue to tolerate India's false flag operations, military adventurism, and attempts to drag the region into war based on fabricated evidence?
China's confirmation of on-site technical support to Pakistan is not an admission of hostility toward India - it is a statement of strategic partnership between two nations committed to regional stability.
As Pakistan and China deepen their defense cooperation, and as India reels from its military and diplomatic defeats, the balance of power in South Asia has fundamentally shifted.
One year after the war, one thing is clear: Pakistan won. India lost. And the world knows why.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Your trusted source for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and comprehensive coverage of today's most important stories.
Get daily updates on breaking news, exclusive interviews, and special features delivered to your inbox.
Have a news tip or want to get in touch with our editorial team? We're here to help.
Plot C3-C Jaypee Wishtown Sector 129 Noida Uttar Pradesh 201304 India